Conceptly
LessonsFormulasPricing
Sign inStart free
Conceptly
TermsPrivacyRefunds
© 2026 · Physics for everyone
  1. Home
  2. Lessons
  3. Mechanics
  4. Equilibrium: Ladders & Hinged Beams
All lessons Mechanics26 min

Equilibrium: Ladders & Hinged Beams

Complete each stage to unlock the next one.

← Moments & Equilibrium: the Non-Uniform BeamNewton's First and Second Laws →
01
Hook
02
Explore
03
Formalize
04
Practice
05
Challenge
Interactive simulation
01

Hook

A 200 N ladder leans against a smooth wall at 60° to the floor. Three forces act — its weight, the wall's push, and whatever the ground supplies — yet the ladder hangs perfectly still. If you slowly lower the foot so the angle shrinks, at some critical angle the ladder suddenly screams across the floor and you hit the deck. What changed? Nothing was added; the ladder just couldn't grip any more. How do you predict the exact angle where the grip runs out?

02

Explore

Complete previous stage
03

Formalize

Complete previous stage
04

Practice

Complete previous stage
05

Challenge

Complete previous stage
Spoilers

Equilibrium: Ladders & Hinged Beams — summary and key formula

ShowHide

The question

A 200 N ladder leans against a smooth wall at 60° to the floor. Three forces act — its weight, the wall's push, and whatever the ground supplies — yet the ladder hangs perfectly still. If you slowly lower the foot so the angle shrinks, at some critical angle the ladder suddenly screams across the floor and you hit the deck. What changed? Nothing was added; the ladder just couldn't grip any more. How do you predict the exact angle where the grip runs out?

Standing still is not 'no forces' — it's forces and TURNING effects that all cancel. A rigid body needs THREE conditions at once: horizontal forces balance, vertical forces balance, and torques balance. The smooth wall can only push horizontally, so the floor's friction is the ONLY thing fighting the slide. Lower the angle and the wall pushes harder, demanding more friction — until the floor can't deliver and the ladder goes. Master the three conditions and you can size that friction, find when a ladder slips, and read off the reactions on a loaded bridge.

The key idea

A rigid body in equilibrium obeys THREE conditions simultaneously: forces balance horizontally (ΣF_x = 0), forces balance vertically (ΣF_y = 0), and turning effects balance (Στ = 0 about ANY point). A single particle only needs the force conditions; an extended body can also rotate, so torque must cancel too. The power move is choosing the pivot wisely: take moments about a point where an unknown force acts, and that force's torque vanishes (zero moment arm), eliminating it from the equation. For a ladder against a SMOOTH wall, the wall supplies only a horizontal normal force, so the floor alone provides vertical support and the friction that stops the slide. For a beam on two supports, taking moments about one support removes its reaction and lets you solve directly for the other.

The one genuinely new idea here is that **'at rest' means two things at once for an extended body: no net force AND no net turning effect.** A point mass can't spin, so ΣF=0\Sigma F = 0ΣF=0 suffices; a ladder or beam can rotate, so we add Στ=0\Sigma\tau = 0Στ=0 about any pivot — and crucially the pivot is OURS to choose. **Why choosing the pivot is a superpower:** a force has zero moment about any point on its own line of action, so if we take moments about the foot of the ladder, both the ground normal NgN_gNg​ and the friction FFF contribute nothing — one equation, one unknown (NwN_wNw​). Picking the pivot to delete the forces you don't want is the single most useful habit in statics. **Smooth vs rough contacts:** a smooth (frictionless) surface can only push perpendicular to itself, so a vertical smooth wall gives a purely horizontal NwN_wNw​; a rough floor gives both a normal NgN_gNg​ and a friction FFF up to a maximum μNg\mu N_gμNg​. The ladder is safe only while the friction it NEEDS, F=NwF = N_wF=Nw​, stays under what the floor can supply: F≤μNgF \le \mu N_gF≤μNg​, i.e. μneeded=Nw/(W+P)≤μ\mu_{\text{needed}} = N_w/(W+P) \le \muμneeded​=Nw​/(W+P)≤μ. **Why a lower angle slips:** Nw=(W/2+Pf)/tan⁡θN_w = (W/2 + P f)/\tan\thetaNw​=(W/2+Pf)/tanθ and tan⁡θ→0\tan\theta \to 0tanθ→0 as the ladder flattens, so the friction demand climbs without bound while the available μNg\mu N_gμNg​ is fixed — eventually demand wins and the ladder shoots out. **Beams:** the same Στ=0\Sigma\tau = 0Στ=0 trick handles bridges and shelves — take moments about one support to expose the reaction at the other. **Connect it:** moments balanced the see-saw of earlier work; here we simply enforce force balance on BOTH axes at the same time.

The formula

ΣFx=0,ΣFy=0,Στ=0;Nw=12W+Pftan⁡θ,Ng=W+P,μneeded=FNg=NwW+P\Sigma F_x = 0,\quad \Sigma F_y = 0,\quad \Sigma\tau = 0; \qquad N_w = \frac{\tfrac{1}{2}W + P f}{\tan\theta},\quad N_g = W + P,\quad \mu_{\text{needed}} = \frac{F}{N_g} = \frac{N_w}{W+P}ΣFx​=0,ΣFy​=0,Στ=0;Nw​=tanθ21​W+Pf​,Ng​=W+P,μneeded​=Ng​F​=W+PNw​​
  • ·The three equilibrium conditions are non-negotiable for a rigid body: ΣF_x = 0 (horizontal forces cancel)
  • ·ΣF_y = 0 (vertical forces cancel)
  • ·Στ = 0 (clockwise moments = anticlockwise moments
  • ·about whatever pivot you pick). For a uniform ladder of weight W leaning at angle θ to the horizontal against a SMOOTH wall
  • ·take moments about the FOOT — this kills N_g and friction F (both pass through the foot). The wall reaction's moment arm is its height L·sinθ; the weight acts at the midpoint with arm (L/2)·cosθ; a person of weight P a fraction f up has arm f·L·cosθ. Balancing gives N_w·L·sinθ = W·(L/2)·cosθ + P·f·L·cosθ
  • ·and L cancels: N_w = (W/2 + P·f)/tanθ. Vertically N_g = W + P. Horizontally the only forces are N_w (from the wall) and F (friction)
  • ·so F = N_w; the friction coefficient needed is μ_needed = F/N_g = N_w/(W+P). For a beam resting on two supports A and B carrying loads
  • ·take moments about A: B's reaction × (distance AB) balances every load's moment
  • ·giving R_B directly; then ΣF_y = 0 gives R_A.

Common mistake

Two killers. First, thinking a flatter ladder is safer: in fact a SMALLER angle needs MORE friction, because N_w = (W/2)/tanθ blows up as tanθ → 0 — flatten the ladder and the friction demand soars. Second, treating a smooth wall as if it pushes UP (a vertical force): a frictionless wall can only push perpendicular to itself, i.e. purely HORIZONTAL, so the floor must supply ALL the vertical support and ALL the friction. Also remember to enforce all three conditions (ΣF_x, ΣF_y, Στ), not just moments, and to take moments about a point that deletes an unknown (the foot, or one beam support).

What to remember

  • ·A rigid body is in equilibrium only when all THREE conditions hold at once — ΣF_x = 0, ΣF_y = 0, and Στ = 0 about any point — and you may choose the pivot to delete an unknown force (take moments about the foot to remove N_g and F, or about one beam support to remove its reaction).
  • ·A smooth wall exerts only a horizontal normal reaction (no friction, no vertical component), so the floor alone carries the weight and supplies the friction; for a uniform ladder N_w = (W/2 + P·f)/tanθ and the friction needed is μ_needed = N_w/(W+P).
  • ·A lower angle (or a load placed higher up) increases the friction DEMANDED while the floor's available grip μN_g stays fixed — so flattening the ladder, not steepening it, is what makes it slip.